Indexing Co vs The Graph
How Indexing Co's pipeline platform compares to The Graph's decentralized indexing protocol for blockchain data.
The Graph pioneered decentralized blockchain indexing. Its subgraph model gave developers a standard way to index smart contract events and query them via GraphQL. The protocol supports 60+ chains, has a large open-source community, and runs on a token-incentivized network of indexers. That matters.
But the protocol's architecture carries trade-offs that show up fast in production. AssemblyScript-only transforms, single-chain subgraphs, full re-indexes on schema changes, and a token-based cost model that makes spend unpredictable. Indexing Co was built to solve these problems without sacrificing flexibility.
Feature Comparison
| Indexing Co | The Graph | |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Custom pipelines | Subgraphs (decentralized protocol) |
| Transform language | TypeScript | AssemblyScript |
| Query interface | SQL, GraphQL, webhooks | GraphQL only |
| Data destination | Your PostgreSQL, BigQuery, webhooks | Hosted GraphQL endpoint |
| Multi-chain | Single pipeline definition | Separate subgraph per chain |
| Schema changes | Hot-swap transforms, no re-index | Full re-index from block zero |
| Block-to-database delivery | sub-500ms (dedicated infra) | Seconds (synced), hours to days (initial sync) |
| Data scope | Contracts, wallets, blocks, transactions | Contract events only |
| Chains | 100+ | 60+ |
| VM support | EVM, Solana, Cosmos, Move | EVM-focused |
| Pricing | Fixed pipeline subscription | GRT token fees (variable) |
| Reorg handling | Built-in confirmation depth | Varies by indexer |
Where The Graph Fits
- Decentralization is a hard requirement. If your project needs censorship-resistant data infrastructure with no single point of failure, The Graph's decentralized indexer network delivers that.
- Simple single-chain frontends. A straightforward dApp on one EVM chain that only needs contract event data via GraphQL. Subgraphs handle this well.
- Open-source community. Large developer ecosystem, extensive documentation, and community-built subgraphs you can fork and deploy.
Where Indexing Co Fits
- Multi-chain production apps. One pipeline definition covers Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Polygon, and more. No separate deployments per chain, no stitching data together.
- Data beyond contract events. Track wallets, decode transactions, index block-level data, and combine it all in a single pipeline. The Graph limits you to contract event logs.
- Predictable costs and fast iteration. Fixed pricing instead of variable GRT token fees. Change your schema or transforms without re-indexing from scratch. Ship updates in minutes, not days.
Related Reading
- Subgraphs Suck: Crypto Data Infra is Changing
- The Evolution of Blockchain Indexing
- Indexing Co vs Subgraphs
- Subgraph Migration: Moving Off The Graph's Hosted Service
FAQ
When is The Graph still a good fit?
The Graph still fits teams that only need contract event indexing, are comfortable with GraphQL, and do not mind operating within the subgraph model.
Why do teams switch from The Graph to Indexing Co?
Teams switch when they need multi-chain pipelines, direct delivery into their own database, non-EVM support, or lower-latency data for production systems.
Can I migrate a use case that started as a subgraph?
Yes. Most teams map the same event sources into TypeScript transforms and move the output into PostgreSQL, BigQuery, or webhooks instead of a hosted GraphQL layer.
Get Started
Move beyond subgraphs. Set up your first pipeline in under 10 minutes.